Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
硬氪：在机器人关节产品迭代上做了哪些工作？，详情可参考旺商聊官方下载
But we've learned a lot since then. JavaScript has evolved. A streaming API designed today can be simpler, more aligned with the language, and more explicit about the things that matter — like backpressure and multi-consumer behavior.，这一点在safew官方版本下载中也有详细论述
"name": "zhPvPpeEImVPiMrshbOHMH4egqaLIwVh5BxevT",